noembed noembed

Commentary, sarcasm and snide remarks from a Florida resident of over thirty years. Being a glutton for punishment is a requirement for residency here. Who am I? I've been called a moonbat by Michelle Malkin, a Right Wing Nut by Daily Kos, and middle of the road by Florida blog State of Sunshine. Tell me what you think.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Dumb ideas or dumb reporting or both?

Did you know there are people who want spelling in the English language to change? These advocates want the language to change so words would spell just as they sound. They think this will improve literacy.

What a bunch of hokum. Much of the problem is related to the fact that many parents show no interest in their child's education and therefore neither does the young boy or young girl. Combine that with the habit of watching television instead of reading makes bad students. You'll never wipe out iliteracy, there are some students who are just dumb. I don't believe everyone is equal, for we aren't.

Another thing. This AP article is written by Darlene Superville. Ms. Superville's reporting has been highighted at TFM before. She was the reporter who told us the contents of Karl Rove's garage.

So I'm beginning to wonder if what we really have here is a very tiny fringe group found by this AP reporter who seems to think the obscure or unimportant is newsworthy. Ms. Superville also wrote this article partially in the way the people she writes of want English to be written now. It's just plain annoying, for the article is a almost unreadable.

Go ahead and read what's below. If I didn't have better candidates, I'd give Ms. Superville another knucklehead award. Some how I think she'll be back again.

Open Post- Basil's Blog, Third World County,

WASHINGTON -- When ``say,'' ``they'' and ``weigh'' rhyme, but ``bomb,'' ``comb'' and ``tomb'' don't, wuudn't it maek mor sens to spel wurdz the wae thae sound?

Those in favor of simplified spelling say children would learn faster and illiteracy rates would drop. Opponents say a new system would make spelling even more confusing.

Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.

It's been 100 years since Andrew Carnegie helped create the Simplified Spelling Board to promote a retooling of written English and President Theodore Roosevelt tried to force the government to use simplified spelling in its publications. But advocates aren't giving up.

They even picket the national spelling bee finals, held every year in Washington, costumed as bumble bees and hoisting signs that say ``Enuf is enuf but enough is too much'' or ``I'm thru with through.''

Thae sae th bee selebraets th ability of a fue stoodents to master a dificult sistem that stumps meny utherz hoo cuud do just as wel if speling were simpler.

``It's a very difficult thing to get something accepted like this,'' acknowledges Alan Mole, president of the American Literacy Council, which favors an end to ``illogical spelling.'' The group says English has 42 sounds spelled in a bewildering 400 ways.

Americans doen't aulwaez go for whut's eezy _ witnes th faeluer of th metric sistem to cach on. But propoenents of simpler speling noet that a smatering of aulterd spelingz hav maed th leep into evrydae ues.

Doughnut also is donut; colour, honour and labour long ago lost the British ``u'' and the similarly derived theatre and centre have been replaced by the easier-to-sound-out theater and center.

``The kinds of progress that we're seeing are that someone will spell night 'nite' and someone will spell through 'thru,''' Mole said. ``We try to show where these spellings are used and to show dictionary makers that they are used so they will include them as alternate spellings.''

Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.

In languages with phonetically spelled words, like German or Spanish, children learn to spell in weeks instead of months or years as is sometimes the case with English, Mole said.

But education professor Donald Bear said to simplify spelling would probably make it more difficult because words get meaning from their prefixes, suffixes and roots.

``Students come to understand how meaning is preserved in the way words are spelled,'' said Bear, director of the E.L. Cord Foundation Center for Learning and Literacy at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Th cuntry's larjest teecherz uennyon, wuns a suporter, aulso objects.


Cross posted to Bullwinkle Blog

 
Listed on BlogShares